Wednesday, 24 June 2015

Australian Coworking Event a Window into Growing Movement


Running over two days, the Global Coworking Unconference Conference Australia (affectionately referred to as “Juicy”) was a meeting of the minds that the industry is so well known for.

Coworking has a lot of moving parts and as such, the many facets of the industry need to be discussed in depth. But more importantly it needs to have all the interested parties involved and that is where GCUCAU really outdid itself.

Bradley Krauskopf, CEO and Founder of Hub Australia, said of the event, "The sold-out GCUC Australia conference amazed me most with it's energy and representation from across small business, corporates, government, university and coworking operators."

On Thursday at Customs House Sydney, Deputy Lord Mayor, Robyn Kemmis, opened the conference on behalf of the City of Sydney. Following that we had the keynote addresses from Liz Elam the founder of GCUC and Bradley Krauskopf.

The day then descended into a series of panel discussions that introduced us to the terms "accelerated serendipity," "space activation" and "bubblegum and cable solutions." 
The most important thing I noticed was how universal a lot of the challenges were, and the obvious potential for small solutions to make life easier for a large number of spaces - Murray Hurps, General Manager of Fishburners
And that was where the breaks came in.

With morning tea and lunch breaks sponsored by Regus, in which you could browse furniture designed for coworking from Cubakai, discuss solutions with BrainTree and LiquidSpace or admire the lovely self-watering plants of Grow Space or visit the angels at Seated Massages, it is clear that even the conferences in coworking are focused on a better way of doing things. Which was the main focus of the conference.

With the many benefits of coworking now known to extend into business growth, employee happiness and even increased productivity, it’s no longer exclusive of start-ups and freelancers, many companies are interested, even governments want to jump on board.

And this is not just a trend reserved to Australia, as one of the panels focused their discussion on the similar boom that’s occurred in America, New Zealand, the UK and Asia, it is clear that coworking as an industry will only continue to grow.
It was great to see such a diversity in the attendees - from kiwi property developers to Chinese coworking operators to the local coworking hosts - Caroline McLaren, Principle of Coactiv8
And it is both inspiring and delightful to see so many people committed to providing this service that they are willing to share their knowledge for the benefit of the larger whole. Or as Liz Elam put it, "There are no sharks in this industry, only guppies, and they’re all working together, so be a guppy."  Which is what was stated time and time again by many of the facilitators.

Day two got a little funky, with everyone at Fishburner’s having an Unconference. It was interesting to see the day take shape as those that create, use or invest in planned what sessions they would like to run and all the hot button issues we’re brought up by the people dealing with them. Sessions were run on everything from meditation to the legal implications of running a space.

But the day didn’t stop there, next it was on to the double-decker London bus for a tour of the coworking spaces supporting the conference. Starting at Fishburner’s who sponsored the bus.

First stop was Tank Stream Labs, followed by Gravity and then Your Desk before ending in Hub Sydney were drinks began and conversations continued.

The conference was thus an amazing mixture of high quality content and also community building for the community of community builders (try saying that three times fast). While coworking was initially dismissed as a fad by some, it is clear that it is here to stay with over 140 Australian coworking spaces and more on the way.

Liz Elam noted, "We were able to bring together coworking leaders, commercial real estate, designers, architects and corporations to discuss this growing industry and examine the drivers and future of this global trend.  GCUC worked as the connecting fiber for an industry that is uniquely poised to change the future of work.”

In the Deskmag’s annual survey for the Coworking Forecast in 2013 people were already reporting that coworking was a positive influence in their lives, with 62% reporting significant improvement in their work, 71% said they were more creative, 90% said they felt more confident and 70% said they felt healthier then they had in a traditional office setting. So it’s no wonder that coworking has a future, but why is it so great?

Coworking combines many positive lifestyle trends into one while removing the negative effects of others. A shorter commute, a friendlier environment, community support, more flexibility, and increased business connections all factor into this new way of working. When you consider the advantages, it's no wonder that coworking is growing.

But when you think about the activities offered at coworking spaces - the wonderful distractions ping-pong, weekly drinks and lunches, and fascinating people - it's surprising that productivity increases. Those running spaces understand that increased ownership of outcomes and conducive work environment make a big difference.

The conversations had and the friendships made are clearly going to be the basis of the future of work.
The most exciting thing about GCUC AU is are all the serendipitous connections we don’t even know about yet … investments, consulting, purchases, partnership and friendships that will ripple effect out of GCUC have yet to be felt … we have just begun … - Liz Elam

Thursday, 18 June 2015

Helping Residents to Lead Change in Their Communities

Debbie Ladds
Debbie Ladds
by Debbie Ladds, New Start: http://newstartmag.co.uk/your-blogs/helping-residents-to-lead-change-in-their-communities/

Last week Local Trust released new findings from a survey looking at whether residents want more control in helping to transform their communities.

Our findings show that the majority of us have a strong desire to be given more of a say in decisions that affect us.

Our survey results found that three-quarters of us (76%) think residents are best placed to know what is needed in their community, with two-thirds (63%) willing to help their neighbours and community if there are opportunities to do so.

We believe that a community and resident-led approach is key to creating lasting, positive change in communities, because it builds on the opportunities and assets available, develops the skills and confidence of the people involved, and creates lasting, long term solutions. But, how can we make this happen?

Our Big Local programme provides residents in 150 communities across England with at least £1m, alongside a range of support, to enable them to build their skills and confidence to create positive changes based on what matters most to them.

We have seen first-hand that putting residents in the lead has the potential to transform communities because the drive for the transformation comes from within the community.

Here are three tips for anyone considering putting residents in the lead:

1. Invest in local skills and build on the assets of people and places

One of the most important aspects of a resident-led approach is investing in and building on the skills and assets that exist locally, rather than just focusing on need. We focus on enabling residents to share their skills and expertise within their Big Local area. For example Thurnscoe Big Local benefited from a local person who was also a BT employee sharing his knowledge of digital communications to help them set-up an online presence using Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and email. Our Big Local evaluation found that 83% of those most involved are learning from those on the journey with them in their community.

2. Be willing to take risks and learn from mistakes

It is important to take a positive approach to risk and be willing to learn through experience. We learn by overcoming challenges and are more committed to the things we have worked hard to achieve. We apply these ideas to Big Local; encouraging residents to gain confidence, try things, learn from mistakes, take time to review and move forward. Through having more control in this way, residents gain greater ownership, which increases levels of local engagement and brings a greater level of respect for developments driven within their communities.

3. Realise change doesn’t happen overnight

Lasting change cannot be created overnight and we cannot expect real, immediate results too quickly. Our approach is based on the understanding that creating lasting change takes time. We know that residents take confidence from this approach: 88% of active community members surveyed for our first Big Local evaluation this year were confident in their ability to make Big Local happen over the long term. And they have time because Big Local lasts until 2027.

Debbie Ladds


Debbie Ladds is chief executive of Local Trust: www.localtrust.org.uk. Follow Debbie Ladds on Twitter:

Tuesday, 16 June 2015

The Opening of the Urban Commons

English: Picture of Queen St Mall taken by mys...
Queen St Mall, Brisbane (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
by Greg Kats, GreenBiz: http://www.greenbiz.com/article/opening-urban-commons

In a seminal 1968 essay on "The Tragedy of the Commons," Garrett Hardin described how self-interest drives individuals to overuse publicly shared land and resources until the commons either collapse or closed to everything but private profit.

Ultimately, enclosure leads to the exploitation and degradation of our environment for the profit of a few.

Despite the long-running history of Hardin's tragedy, I think we are in the middle of a remarkable reversal - although this time, the action is concentrated in our cities.

It is a phenomenon I call the "opening of the Urban Commons," where private infrastructure is increasingly becoming shared and where huge monopoly energy systems are giving way to shared ownership of generating assets.

The opening of the urban commons is inherently democratic. Decisions about resource use are fragmenting and distributing down to the individual level, where both buyers and sellers receive information enabling informed and mutually agreed-upon transactions. This shift has the opposite impact of the closing of the rural commons.

The opening of the urban commons creates greater job opportunity, flexibility and resilience. A direct consequence of this shift is to dramatically reduce the environmental damage on the real world - the ecosystems our species and economy is embedded in and entirely reliant upon for its existence and survival.

Shifting to sharing

The American ideal of large, standalone suburban homes and driving (usually alone) in privately owned cars to jobs, specialized shops and services is starting to give way. Urban preferences for smaller, connected homes or apartments within walking distance go hand in hand with declining car ownership and the explosion of shared services headlined by firms such as Uber and shared bike services such as Washington D.C.'s Capital Bikeshare.

An app showing real time location of smart bikes and smart bike racks enables far more biking because bikes are available and droppable almost anywhere, cutting congestion and reducing needs for taxis. Shared transport ownership reduces CO2 footprints, tons of steel on the road and creates a fellowship of two-wheeled travelers that feels like community.

The great Jane Jacobs, in her seminal work "The Death and Life of Great American Cities," describes the importance of proximate neighbors in urban areas for crime reduction and for creating connections and community. We are seeing a rapid growth in exactly such urban and suburban walkable green communities.

The explosion of Uber and Lyft reflects a market view that taxi services are shifting permanently and rapidly from centrally owned, controlled and dispatched fleets to individual services through a direct client-to-provider, time-and-price brokered market. For Uber or Lyft drivers, the average car ownership cost of about $8,700 per year is now allocated across longer usage hours, meaning low marginal cost for private car usage for income generation.

Increased time of use of cars by Uber drivers in turn reduces need for additional taxis, driving a net societal reduction in automobiles. And because privately owned cars - either driven via an Uber or rented via firms such as RelayRides - now have opportunity costs measured in forgone income, owner personal use of cars probably goes down.

Real time ridesharing platforms also enable and foster increased occupancy and community links, further reducing tons of steel on the road or parked. Similarly, Airbnb - with a market value of about $50 billion, or enough for all 35 million American families with children under 18 to spend a week at a nice hotel - occupancy rates of existing homes and apartments are rising, reducing demand for construction of new hotels.

The trust-based network of clients and hosts (often the same) also creates a basis for community built on transparency and accountability, features characteristic of local community management of shared natural resources, as existed before the closing of the rural commons.

The new economics of urban life

The growth of the urban commons encompasses where and how we live, therefore largely determining what transport we use. Together, this represents a huge part of our expenses and has the potential to directly reduce the economic risks we experience in our lives.

The Wall Street Journal recently reported on a study by Airbnb that found over 10,000 hosts on the platform relied on rental income while launching new businesses. The flexibility and control of being able to earn income from your home and car increases income options, reduces risk, adds financial flexibility and strengthens household and community financial resilience.

The shift in preferences among millennials and empty nesters from sprawling, car-dependent houses to smaller, walkable mixed-use dwellings can cut energy use and climate pollution by more than half due to smaller living units, shared walls (less heating and AC) and greatly reduced driving.

Huge kitchens in sprawl homes featuring rarely used specialized appliances are traded in for smaller kitchens in walking distance to coffee shops, bakeries and bistros. Increased exercise and community also improves health, happiness and longevity (you are likely to live eight years longer if you have strong social networks than if you are lonely).

A Big Data real estate platform called Places has developed a set of real estate risk metrics that provide a more accurate default risk predictor than the industry norm FICO score.

Places’ thesis includes that walkable mixed use buildings near public transit have far lower credit risk than sprawl buildings, in large part because they require less or no private automobile ownership, have much lower energy and water bills and provide greater employment access.

In the case of job loss, a nurse in a walkable, mixed-use area with public transit access has far lower car costs and can access more new jobs than if she were stuck in a suburbia. In theory, that makes the nurse less likely to default on her loan.

To test this thesis, a top 10 U.S. residential loan provider screened a 100,000-home loan portfolio using the Places screen. Compared to its own FICO-based loan decisions on the portfolio, the analysis found that the Places screen would have saved $250 million by avoiding bad loans to high FICO scorers and would have resulted in an additional $5 billion in good loans to lower FICO scorers.

A nurse in a walkable, mixed-use neighborhood that can access public transit and shared bike and car services does not need to own a car and, with a FICO score of 600, turns out to be better credit risk that a sprawl-occupying, car-dependent worker in an isolated area with a FICO score of 700.

The greater flexibility of shared urban-based services provides cost avoidance and income generating options that greatly enhance economic resilience - and cause far less environmental damage. Still, greening is sometimes inaccurately portrayed as being an option only for the wealthy.

I had the good fortune of being the principal advisor to Enterprise Community Partners in designing and developing what is now the national standard for green low-income housing.

The design standard at Green Communities cuts energy and water use by a third, increases tenant comfort and air quality, increases on-site power generation. The standards encourage cost-effective design and have been used as the basis for over 100,000 low-income units, generally in dense, mixed-use areas with walking access to amenities.

Walkable, green, healthy design reduces car dependence and costs while also improving health (especially respiratory), enabling fewer sick days from school and work. Lower costs of transportation, increased resilience, fewer work and school sick days and lower energy bills - all those things really matter to the well-being and financial security of low income families.

Powering the next generation of cities

Hardin, in his "Tragedy for the Commons" essay, notes that acquisition of energy is a problem that drives resources overuse and pollution of the common air and water. While Hardin wondered if atomic energy might change the limits on energy, it turns out that sunshine combined with energy efficiency is the driver that is most rapidly democratizing energy.

While solar PV has exploded in the last decade, most people - including apartment dwellers - do not have roofs on which to put solar panels. A fast-emerging area is shared or community solar that allows people with or without sunny roofs to buy an ownership stake in local or remote renewable energy generating projects, financing new clean energy and ensuring lower, fixed long-term utility payments.

The motto of the community solar wind company UnitedWind is “Be Your Own Power Company." A new firm, Solstice Initiative, is aiming to enable middle- and low-income renters to buy a piece of a solar PV project with no capital cost, locking in lower long-term rates than conventional dirty power.

New forms of financing such as Pace bonds offered by firms such as Renovate America and PACE Funding Group allow efficiency and renewable energy to be financed at long term low rates via an assessment of the property tax bill. Because energy savings exceed the cost of financing, homeowners save money and home values rise. Such measures increase home value and reduce home ownership costs, in turn reducing risk of default.

Proliferation of smart energy efficiency management tools, such as Nest's smart thermostats, along with building energy optimization platforms, such as AtSite and BuildingIQ, allow homeowners and businesses to actively reshape power consumption. From there, it is possible to cut energy bills and earn money by reducing power or providing power quality services on demand.

In the multi-state PJM power market, most peak generating capacity (required to provide peak demand in air condition intensive summer months) is no longer provided by occasionally operated power plants but by utility clients who, for a fee, reduce electricity consumption or generate power to meet utility-wide peak power needs.

The effect of providing these new, distributed-revenue sources is to reduce construction of new power plants, increase systemwide energy efficiency and cut pollution.

With these smart distributed generating and energy efficiency strategies, subscribers can monitor the power output or see real time generation, savings and even see visuals of turning wind turbines or working solar PV systems in which they have an ownership stake.

This transparency and accountability for household, school and business-owned energy assets is a huge democratic transformation with positive environmental benefits. Consider newly available energy options, as illustrated by my own home.

My family lives in a house with a Sunpower, U.S.-manufactured 8.25 KW solar PV solar energy system powering most of our home and charging our electric car, a BMW i3, currently the most fuel efficient commercial car in the world and a blast to drive. The electricity generated from sunlight hitting our roof displaces gasoline from an unknown source.

Increased transparency, individual control and accountability are also more general characteristic of the new Urban Commons. An Uber driver or passenger who is repeatedly rude is likely to be shut out. An Airbnb host or guest who is abusive will be excluded from the network.

This accountability enables the Urban Commons to work effectively at efficient resource sharing, community building and cutting pollution. The emerging Urban Commons is good news for all of us, especially for future generations whose quality of life depends on the decisions (especially on climate change) that we make today.

The opening of the Urban Commons is enabling a richer, healthier, lower-risk, less costly and less environmentally damaging way of life. Welcome to the opening.

Friday, 5 June 2015

A Truly Green Economy Requires Alliances Between Labour and Indigenous People

(Photo: Light Brigading/flickr/cc)
by Harsha Walia, Common Dreams: http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/06/04/truly-green-economy-requires-alliances-between-labour-and-indigenous-people

Dozens of social movement organizers recently gathered in Toronto at a meeting convened by the This Changes Everything team to envision a new economy centered on climate justice.

With relentless extractions of labor and land harming all life on earth, cross-sectoral alliances are necessary.

But a number of predictable tensions bubbled up at the gathering, some related to land defence and workers’ rights. How do we shift from a petro-economy to prevent catastrophic climate change while safeguarding workers whose livelihoods depend on the resource economy?

Over the past few decades a green economy, which would ensure jobs and equity within a low-carbon economy, has been posited as a solution.

Extending from this and in the context of reconciliation, I want to envision emancipatory possibilities of solidarity between workers’ movements for self-management and Indigenous struggles for self-determination.

Land defence as labor, blockades as pickets

Capitalism not only creates the conditions for the expropriation of labour, but also limits what can even be characterized as labor.

Our society primarily defines workers as those producing within the industrial, financial, service or technological economies. Labor outside of these economies is not only devalued, but also unrecognized as productive labor. This includes reproductive and affective labor, land stewardship, and care work.

Single mothers, elders, peasants, women of color, and Indigenous communities, all of whom are deliberately impoverished and stigmatized as “uncontributing,” overwhelmingly undertake this hard work that maintains life itself.

Blockades from Clayoquot to Caledonia have long been sites of conflict between workers in the resource sector and land defenders working to protect the land. Within the house of labor we can create a formidable precedent by respecting blockades as legitimate picket lines.

Furthermore, since land grabs are, to borrow from David Harvey, accumulation by dispossession, Indigenous land defence is an impediment to capital accumulation. Dene scholar Glen Coulthard notes that blockades “seek to negatively impact the economic infrastructure that is core to the colonial accumulation of capital in settler political economies like Canada’s.”

Strident working-class movements picket to hamper capital’s exploitation of labour and strike for workers’ collective control over the means of production. Similarly, Indigenous nations blockade to prevent state and capital’s expropriation of natural resources by asserting Indigenous jurisdiction.

Green economy or Indigenous land-based economies?

Indigenous land defenders rarely describe their efforts as work, but rather say they are protecting a way of a life under attack by development projects.

As Lianna Spence from Lax Kw’alaams, who recently voted to reject Pacific NorthWest LNG’s project, states, “They’re offering us benefits if we vote Yes. But we already have a lot of benefits around us - we have coho, spring and sockeye salmon. We have halibut, crab and eulachon.”

We have normalized the idea of labor as a job that extracts time and energy from us for someone else’s profit. But If we understand “work” and “way of life” as synonymous - as generative rather than extractive processes - it becomes evident that Indigenous nations are working to protect laws and relations stemming from their land-based economies.

Such economies are not only local and sustainable, but also offer a profound challenge to the logics of commodification and isolation inherent to capitalist markets.

Author Leanne Betasamosake Simpson articulates, “If I look at how my ancestors even 200 years ago, they didn’t spend a lot of time banking capital, they didn’t rely on material wealth for their well-being and economic stability. They put energy into meaningful and authentic relationships. So their food security and economic security was based on how good and how resilient their relationships were.”

With growing attacks against them since the 1980s, many North American unions retreated from anti-capitalist stances and took on more constrained slogans of “more jobs” or “fair working conditions.”

Fighting for dignified conditions of work is most potent when done alongside a systemic challenge to capitalist and state relations that subjugate the social and class positioning of workers (particularly racialized non-citizen women increasingly stratified into precarious work).

The bold leadership of unions that revive principles of social unionism ensures that unions are not simply advocating mobility within capitalism and state structures, but are primary allies in the struggle against capitalism and imperialism.

As Herman Rosenfeld, a former GM worker, writes, “Job security is key, but what kind of jobs? Is the job security strategy one that works against the interests of the rest of the working-class and First Nations peoples, or in partnership with them?

Moving away from the narrow focus on the short-term sectoral interests of a relatively small group of workers, whose jobs are currently defined by their employers, is a critical way of building unions as fighters for the class as a whole, and for a different, sustainable, and hopefully anti-capitalist future.”

Simply put, workers shouldn’t have to extract toxic sludge. Workers want and need clean air, clean water, and a more equitable future.

Labour within settler-colonialism

While a reconceptualization of work strengthens alliances between workers and Indigenous movements, it is inadequate in contending with settler-colonialism and the context of labouring on Indigenous lands.

Since the inception of Canada, settler-colonialism has sought to forcibly displace Indigenous peoples from their territories, destroy self-determination within Indigenous governance, and assimilate Indigenous cultures and traditions. The Truth and Reconciliation Commission has painstakingly recounted how Canada clearly participated in “cultural genocide.”

A pervasive myth is that the Canadian economy subsidizes Indigenous communities. The reality is the opposite. As one tangible act of reconciliation, unions can educate members on how industry’s profits are not only generated by the labor of the working class.

The wealth of Canadian society as a whole could not be built, as Dru Oja Jay argues, “without massive subsidies: of [Indigenous] land, resource wealth, and the incalculable cost of generations of suffering.”

Or imagine if every union in Canada adopted the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and made free, prior and informed consent from Indigenous nations a necessary part of any collective bargaining it undertakes with government and industry.

The possibilities are endless and the power within such genuine acts of solidarity and reconciliation are transformative.

Given the scale of catastrophic climate change, state violence and capitalist crisis, we need to reimagine work as that which makes up the ecology and economy of everyday life through the generations. When it comes to the job of decolonization and protection of life, many aren’t getting a paycheck at all.

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

World's Most Bike-Friendly Cities Ranked: Copenhagen Takes Top Spot

World's Most Bike-Friendly Cities Ranked
Copenhagen (Photo: Grisha Levit/Flickr)
by Outside Online: http://www.outsideonline.com/1987166/worlds-most-bike-friendly-cities-ranked

Copenhagenize, a multinational urban design consultancy, has released the 2015 edition of the Copenhagenize Index, which ranks the world’s best cities for cyclists.

This year, 122 cities around the globe were ranked according to 13 parameters, including safety, infrastructure, social acceptance, and “modal share,” which describes the percentage of the city’s travelers and commuters who get around by bike.

Copenhagen, which finished second in the last two Copenhagenize rankings, took first place on the 2015 list.

“The Danish capital remains impressively consistent in its investment in cycling as transport and in making efforts to push it to the next level,” the report’s authors write on the Copenhagenize website. “With regards to a uniform network of urban design for bicycles, Copenhagen is unrivaled in the world.”

The only U.S. city in this year’s top 20 - and the first U.S. city to appear since 2013 - is Minneapolis. Copenhagenize’s analysts noted the city’s popular bike share system, 117 miles of bike lanes, and “an impressive - for America - modal share.”

The difficulties of winter travel in Minneapolis by bicycle (or, indeed, any mode of transport) were not lost on the report’s authors, who suggested improving bike path clearance during months when the city’s streets are covered in snow.

“New cities storm into the top 20 at the expense of others,” Copenhagenize CEO Mikael Colville-Andersen said in a Wired article announcing the release of the 2015 list.

While Dublin has gone from 11th to 15th place, Montreal has dropped from 14th to 20th. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Nagoya, Japan, fell out of the top 20 entirely. The U.S. cities of Portland, San Francisco, and New York City, all of which have appeared in the top 20 in the past, also failed to make this year’s list.